See what a Fesoti report looks like

Capital Passport — Source-of-Wealth opinion

Reference: SOW-2026-0142 · Date: 20 July 2026 · Prepared by: Fesoti S.R.L., Asunción, Paraguay

1 · Summary

Lawful origin of approximately USD 1,240,000 is supported across three documented sources: IT employment savings (2014–2020), early ETH/BTC purchases (2016–2017), and the 2021 sale of a private-company stake. On-chain history is continuous and consistent with the declared narrative.

2 · Sources of capital

Source	Period	Amount (≈)	Supporting documents
IT employment savings	2014–2020	USD 320,000	Contracts, payroll statements, tax returns
Early ETH/BTC purchase	2016–2017	USD 180,000 invested	Exchange statements, bank payments, order history
Sale of company stake	2021	USD 500,000	Share purchase agreement, bank credit, notarial deed

3 · On-chain analysis & attribution

Wallet (masked)	Network	First seen	Main counterparties	Flags
bc1q…7f3a	Bitcoin	2017	Kraken, Bitstamp (KYC)	None
0x9c…d21e	Ethereum	2016	Coinbase, Uniswap	None
0x4a…88b0	Ethereum	2021	Escrow settlement	None

4 · Risk screening

Check	Result
Sanctions (OFAC / EU / UN)	No match
PEP / adverse media	None found
Mixers / darknet / hacks	No exposure

5 · Conclusions & limitations

On the basis of the documents provided and independent on-chain analysis, the origin of the client’s crypto-assets is lawful and documented, with a low money-laundering risk. This opinion reflects data available at the date of preparation and is not a guarantee of acceptance by any specific institution.

On-Chain Investigation — Tracing opinion

Reference: INV-2026-0088 · Date: 12 June 2026 · Prepared by: Fesoti S.R.L., Asunción, Paraguay

1 · Summary

Approximately USD 85,000 in USDT (TRON), reported stolen on 3 June 2026, was traced across six hops from the victim’s address to two exchange deposit addresses. One intermediate hop shows contact with a known mixer; the remaining flow is attributable. A case file was prepared for exchange and law-enforcement submission (no recovery is promised).

2 · Flow of funds (masked)

Hop	Address	Note
0	TXm…q4a1	Victim address (theft origin)
3	TQh…8b0e	Mixer touch — flagged
6	TKz…5c22 / TNf…10ad	Deposit addresses at KYC exchanges

3 · Screening & next steps

Sanctions screening returned no direct match on the destination addresses. Recommended next steps: submit the case file to the two exchanges’ compliance teams and, in parallel, to law enforcement with the victim’s report reference. Confidence levels are stated per hop in the full report.

Pre-Transaction Check — Counterparty risk opinion

Reference: PTC-2026-0203 · Date: 26 July 2026 · Prepared by: Fesoti S.R.L., Asunción, Paraguay

1 · Summary

Before accepting an incoming payment of approximately USD 60,000 in USDT (Ethereum), the paying address was screened for sanctions, illicit-source exposure and known-evil labels. There were no direct high-risk hits; a small indirect exposure to a mixer (2 hops) sits below our acceptance threshold. We recommend proceeding only after obtaining the counterparty’s KYC.

2 · Addresses assessed

Address (masked)	Network	First seen	Direct exposure	Flags
0x7d…a19c	Ethereum	2022	KYC exchange, DeFi	None direct
0x2f…64b8	Ethereum	2023	Intermediate wallet	Indirect: mixer (2 hops)

3 · Exposure & attribution

Category	Exposure	Note
Sanctioned entities	0%	No match
Darknet / illicit	0%	No exposure
Mixers / tumblers	~3% (indirect)	2 hops away, below threshold
KYC exchanges	~71%	Majority via regulated venues

4 · Risk screening

Check	Result
Sanctions (OFAC / EU / UN)	No match
PEP / adverse media	None found
Known-evil labels	None direct

5 · Recommendation & limitations

Proceed with caution: obtain the counterparty’s KYC and a short source-of-funds note before crediting. This opinion reflects on-chain data available at the date of preparation and is not a guarantee of any institution’s decision.